|
Today, the Reserve Bank released the results of 49th round of its quarterly Services and Infrastructure Outlook Survey (SIOS) conducted during Q1:2026-27. This forward-looking survey1 captures qualitative assessment and expectations of Indian companies engaged in the services and infrastructure sectors on a set of business parameters relating to demand conditions, price situation and other business conditions. In the latest round of the survey2, 1,007 companies provided their assessment for Q1:2026-27 and expectations for Q2:2026-27 as well as outlook on key parameters for the subsequent two quarters.
Highlights:
A. Services Sector
Assessment for Q1:2026-27
-
Service sector firms remained positive about their overall business situation, turnover and employment in Q1:2026-27, with moderation in sentiments compared to the previous quarter (Chart 1 and Table A).
-
Responding firms reported higher cost pressures arising from input costs and salary outgo.
-
Services firms assessed broadly stable selling price growth in Q1:2026-27, leading to pressure on profit margins.
Expectations for Q2:2026-27
-
Services firms remain optimistic about demand conditions in Q2:2026-27, with some corrections when compared with the previous quarter (Chart 1 and Table A).
-
Firms expect higher pressures from input costs in Q2:2026-27, while wage cost pressures are expected to ease.
Expectations for Q3:2026-27 and Q4:2026-27
- Responding services firms reported that with their existing resources they could have delivered 8.8 per cent additional services during Q4:2025-26 (Table S14).
B. Infrastructure Sector
Assessment for Q1:2026-27
-
Infrastructure firms assessed positive demand conditions in Q1:2026-27, (Chart 2 and Table B).
-
Enterprises reported higher cost pressures during Q1:2026-27.
Expectations for Q2:2026-27
-
Outlook on overall business situation, turnover and employment conditions is positive for Q2:2026-27; a tad lower when compared with the previous survey round (Table B).
-
Pressures from input and salary costs are likely to persist during Q2:2026-27.
Expectations for Q3:2026-27 and Q4:2026-27
Summary of Net Responses3 on Survey Parameters
| Table A: Services Sector |
| (per cent) |
| Parameters |
Assessment period |
Expectations period |
| Q4:2025-26* |
Q1:2026-27 |
Q1:2026-27* |
Q2:2026-27 |
| Overall Business Situation |
36.1 |
15.6 |
64.2 |
60.1 |
| Turnover |
38.1 |
16.4 |
66.7 |
62.1 |
| Full-time Employees |
24.0 |
12.9 |
50.0 |
50.1 |
| Part-time Employees |
12.8 |
6.8 |
41.6 |
44.9 |
| Availability of Finance |
23.9 |
13.1 |
48.3 |
48.3 |
| Cost of Finance |
-22.5 |
-17.8 |
-41.8 |
-49.6 |
| Salary & Wages |
-29.2 |
-31.1 |
-62.8 |
-56.2 |
| Cost of Inputs |
-35.5 |
-40.9 |
-58.9 |
-62.9 |
| Selling Price |
12.5 |
12.5 |
42.8 |
48.5 |
| Profit Margin |
9.0 |
-7.5 |
39.3 |
38.7 |
| Inventories |
17.5 |
8.5 |
39.5 |
45.4 |
| Technical/Service Capacity |
20.6 |
13.1 |
50.2 |
55.0 |
| Physical Investment |
15.6 |
11.9 |
47.9 |
53.8 |
| *: Based on the previous round’s response. |
| Table B: Infrastructure Sector |
| (per cent) |
| Parameters |
Assessment period |
Expectations period |
| Q4:2025-26* |
Q1:2026-27 |
Q1:2026-27* |
Q2:2026-27 |
| Overall Business Situation |
29.5 |
15.7 |
71.9 |
54.5 |
| Turnover |
29.3 |
18.4 |
68.9 |
57.6 |
| Full-time Employees |
18.0 |
14.6 |
57.0 |
46.9 |
| Part-time Employees |
16.8 |
14.9 |
59.4 |
49.4 |
| Availability of Finance |
20.5 |
23.8 |
59.5 |
49.5 |
| Cost of Finance |
-13.6 |
-21.1 |
-49.2 |
-38.3 |
| Salary & Wages |
-21.3 |
-36.7 |
-64.5 |
-59.4 |
| Cost of Inputs |
-37.8 |
-51.5 |
-70.3 |
-69.1 |
| Selling Price |
16.4 |
28.9 |
57.8 |
53.5 |
| Profit Margin |
5.8 |
11.3 |
50.8 |
51.0 |
| Inventories |
11.0 |
16.8 |
57.6 |
41.9 |
| Technical/Service Capacity |
18.0 |
25.7 |
62.2 |
64.3 |
| Physical Investment |
26.7 |
25.3 |
71.7 |
67.6 |
| *: Based on the previous round’s response. |
| Expectations of Select Parameters for extended period – Net response |
| (in per cent) |
| Table C: Services Sector |
| Parameter |
Round 48 |
Round 49 |
| Q1:2026-27 |
Q2:2026-27 |
Q3:2026-27 |
Q4:2026-27 |
| Overall Business Situation |
64.2 |
60.1 |
62.5 |
63.6 |
| Turnover |
66.7 |
62.1 |
66.2 |
66.0 |
| Full-time Employees |
50.0 |
50.1 |
52.3 |
52.5 |
| Part-time Employees |
41.6 |
44.9 |
48.5 |
48.5 |
| Cost of Inputs |
-58.9 |
-62.9 |
-60.7 |
-59.7 |
| Selling Price |
42.8 |
48.5 |
49.7 |
51.9 |
| Table D: Infrastructure Sector |
| Parameter |
Round 48 |
Round 49 |
| Q1:2026-27 |
Q2:2026-27 |
Q3:2026-27 |
Q4:2026-27 |
| Overall Business Situation |
71.9 |
54.5 |
54.6 |
58.8 |
| Turnover |
68.9 |
57.6 |
55.6 |
58.2 |
| Full-time Employees |
57.0 |
46.9 |
50.0 |
48.5 |
| Part-time Employees |
59.4 |
49.4 |
55.4 |
54.2 |
| Cost of Inputs |
-70.3 |
-69.1 |
-56.3 |
-56.3 |
| Selling Price |
57.8 |
53.5 |
50.0 |
51.2 |
Note: Please see the excel file for time series data
Services Sector
| Table S1: Assessment and Expectation for Overall Business Situation |
| (Percentage responses)@ |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Better |
No Change |
Worse |
Net response# |
Better |
No Change |
Worse |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
45.8 |
44.0 |
10.2 |
35.5 |
71.7 |
26.2 |
2.1 |
69.6 |
| Q2:25-26 |
46.5 |
44.2 |
9.3 |
37.2 |
60.9 |
36.9 |
2.2 |
58.7 |
| Q3:25-26 |
43.5 |
46.0 |
10.5 |
33.0 |
74.5 |
24.1 |
1.3 |
73.2 |
| Q4:25-26 |
45.0 |
46.2 |
8.8 |
36.1 |
71.9 |
26.5 |
1.7 |
70.2 |
| Q1:26-27 |
34.6 |
46.4 |
19.0 |
15.6 |
67.5 |
29.2 |
3.3 |
64.2 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
63.5 |
33.1 |
3.4 |
60.1 |
‘Increase’ in Overall business situation is optimistic. @: Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100. #: Net Response (NR) is the difference of percentage of the respondents reporting optimism and that reporting pessimism. The range is -100 to 100. Any value greater than zero indicates expansion/ optimism and any value less than zero indicates contraction/ pessimism. |
| Table S2: Assessment and Expectation for Turnover |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
46.8 |
41.8 |
11.4 |
35.4 |
74.8 |
22.7 |
2.5 |
72.3 |
| Q2:25-26 |
47.4 |
42.8 |
9.7 |
37.7 |
64.0 |
32.4 |
3.7 |
60.3 |
| Q3:25-26 |
45.0 |
42.4 |
12.5 |
32.5 |
76.2 |
21.7 |
2.1 |
74.0 |
| Q4:25-26 |
49.1 |
39.9 |
11.0 |
38.1 |
71.9 |
25.6 |
2.5 |
69.4 |
| Q1:26-27 |
37.3 |
41.7 |
21.0 |
16.4 |
71.3 |
24.0 |
4.7 |
66.7 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
66.5 |
29.2 |
4.3 |
62.1 |
| ‘Increase’ in Turnover is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S3: Assessment and Expectation for Full-time Employees |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
30.5 |
60.6 |
9.0 |
21.5 |
55.1 |
43.8 |
1.1 |
53.9 |
| Q2:25-26 |
28.2 |
63.7 |
8.1 |
20.0 |
41.9 |
56.7 |
1.5 |
40.4 |
| Q3:25-26 |
29.9 |
61.1 |
9.1 |
20.8 |
51.2 |
47.1 |
1.7 |
49.5 |
| Q4:25-26 |
32.7 |
58.6 |
8.7 |
24.0 |
47.4 |
51.2 |
1.3 |
46.1 |
| Q1:26-27 |
28.0 |
57.0 |
15.1 |
12.9 |
51.8 |
46.5 |
1.8 |
50.0 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
52.6 |
44.9 |
2.5 |
50.1 |
| ‘Increase’ in Full-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S4: Assessment and Expectation for Part-time Employees |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
23.4 |
69.3 |
7.3 |
16.1 |
58.0 |
40.6 |
1.5 |
56.5 |
| Q2:25-26 |
25.5 |
67.2 |
7.3 |
18.3 |
41.9 |
56.1 |
2.1 |
39.8 |
| Q3:25-26 |
25.3 |
67.9 |
6.8 |
18.5 |
51.1 |
46.1 |
2.7 |
48.4 |
| Q4:25-26 |
20.3 |
72.2 |
7.5 |
12.8 |
47.7 |
50.2 |
2.0 |
45.7 |
| Q1:26-27 |
19.9 |
67.0 |
13.1 |
6.8 |
44.5 |
52.6 |
2.9 |
41.6 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
48.2 |
48.5 |
3.3 |
44.9 |
| ‘Increase’ in Part-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S5: Assessment and Expectation for Availability of Finance |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Improve |
No Change |
Worsen |
Net response |
Improve |
No Change |
Worsen |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
30.1 |
62.8 |
7.0 |
23.1 |
58.4 |
40.2 |
1.4 |
57.0 |
| Q2:25-26 |
34.2 |
58.7 |
7.0 |
27.2 |
46.1 |
52.2 |
1.7 |
44.4 |
| Q3:25-26 |
30.7 |
61.4 |
7.8 |
22.9 |
59.5 |
38.9 |
1.7 |
57.8 |
| Q4:25-26 |
30.7 |
62.4 |
6.9 |
23.9 |
54.3 |
44.3 |
1.5 |
52.8 |
| Q1:26-27 |
25.5 |
62.0 |
12.5 |
13.1 |
50.2 |
48.0 |
1.8 |
48.3 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
50.3 |
47.7 |
2.0 |
48.3 |
| ‘Improve’ in Availability of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S6: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Finance |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
32.3 |
59.4 |
8.3 |
-23.9 |
61.5 |
36.4 |
2.0 |
-59.5 |
| Q2:25-26 |
31.0 |
61.3 |
7.7 |
-23.3 |
44.1 |
51.4 |
4.4 |
-39.7 |
| Q3:25-26 |
32.8 |
59.7 |
7.4 |
-25.4 |
51.6 |
44.4 |
4.0 |
-47.6 |
| Q4:25-26 |
31.0 |
60.5 |
8.5 |
-22.5 |
48.9 |
47.7 |
3.3 |
-45.6 |
| Q1:26-27 |
28.5 |
60.8 |
10.7 |
-17.8 |
46.0 |
49.9 |
4.1 |
-41.8 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
51.5 |
46.7 |
1.8 |
-49.6 |
| ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S7: Assessment and Expectation for Salary/Wages |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
42.2 |
54.4 |
3.4 |
-38.8 |
61.9 |
37.7 |
0.4 |
-61.5 |
| Q2:25-26 |
33.8 |
61.6 |
4.6 |
-29.1 |
43.6 |
55.5 |
0.9 |
-42.7 |
| Q3:25-26 |
31.2 |
64.3 |
4.4 |
-26.8 |
51.9 |
46.9 |
1.2 |
-50.8 |
| Q4:25-26 |
33.9 |
61.5 |
4.6 |
-29.2 |
51.9 |
47.0 |
1.1 |
-50.8 |
| Q1:26-27 |
39.4 |
52.4 |
8.3 |
-31.1 |
64.0 |
34.9 |
1.2 |
-62.8 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
57.0 |
42.2 |
0.8 |
-56.2 |
| ‘Decrease’ in Salary/Wages is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S8: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Inputs |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
41.4 |
53.1 |
5.5 |
-35.9 |
70.1 |
29.0 |
0.9 |
-69.2 |
| Q2:25-26 |
43.7 |
51.7 |
4.6 |
-39.1 |
54.3 |
44.7 |
1.0 |
-53.2 |
| Q3:25-26 |
40.0 |
54.7 |
5.3 |
-34.7 |
55.3 |
42.9 |
1.8 |
-53.5 |
| Q4:25-26 |
40.2 |
55.1 |
4.7 |
-35.5 |
56.6 |
42.4 |
1.1 |
-55.5 |
| Q1:26-27 |
48.9 |
43.1 |
8.0 |
-40.9 |
59.7 |
39.6 |
0.8 |
-58.9 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
63.8 |
35.2 |
1.0 |
-62.9 |
| ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Inputs is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S9: Assessment and Expectation for Selling Price |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
22.9 |
69.6 |
7.5 |
15.4 |
57.4 |
41.1 |
1.6 |
55.8 |
| Q2:25-26 |
23.7 |
68.6 |
7.7 |
16.0 |
39.4 |
58.4 |
2.2 |
37.2 |
| Q3:25-26 |
23.2 |
68.3 |
8.5 |
14.6 |
48.6 |
48.6 |
2.8 |
45.8 |
| Q4:25-26 |
19.9 |
72.8 |
7.3 |
12.5 |
49.0 |
49.0 |
2.0 |
47.1 |
| Q1:26-27 |
24.1 |
64.2 |
11.7 |
12.5 |
44.4 |
54.0 |
1.6 |
42.8 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
50.2 |
48.1 |
1.7 |
48.5 |
| ‘Increase’ in Selling Price is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S10: Assessment and Expectation for Profit Margin |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
24.4 |
59.3 |
16.3 |
8.1 |
53.0 |
43.3 |
3.7 |
49.3 |
| Q2:25-26 |
29.0 |
56.4 |
14.6 |
14.4 |
39.2 |
56.1 |
4.6 |
34.6 |
| Q3:25-26 |
25.4 |
57.6 |
16.9 |
8.5 |
54.8 |
40.3 |
4.9 |
49.9 |
| Q4:25-26 |
23.7 |
61.6 |
14.7 |
9.0 |
49.4 |
46.3 |
4.3 |
45.1 |
| Q1:26-27 |
19.9 |
52.7 |
27.4 |
-7.5 |
44.9 |
49.5 |
5.6 |
39.3 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
46.3 |
46.1 |
7.6 |
38.7 |
| ‘Increase’ in Profit Margin is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S11: Assessment and Expectation for Inventories |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
22.8 |
68.6 |
8.6 |
14.3 |
56.1 |
41.9 |
2.0 |
54.1 |
| Q2:25-26 |
26.7 |
64.2 |
9.1 |
17.6 |
41.9 |
55.3 |
2.9 |
39.0 |
| Q3:25-26 |
28.6 |
62.9 |
8.5 |
20.1 |
55.4 |
42.0 |
2.6 |
52.7 |
| Q4:25-26 |
25.0 |
67.5 |
7.5 |
17.5 |
49.9 |
47.5 |
2.6 |
47.3 |
| Q1:26-27 |
20.7 |
67.1 |
12.2 |
8.5 |
42.4 |
54.6 |
2.9 |
39.5 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
48.1 |
49.3 |
2.6 |
45.4 |
| ‘Increase’ in Inventories is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S12: Assessment and Expectation for Technical/Service Capacity |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
23.3 |
73.0 |
3.7 |
19.7 |
62.7 |
37.3 |
0.0 |
62.7 |
| Q2:25-26 |
28.4 |
65.7 |
5.9 |
22.4 |
46.0 |
53.7 |
0.3 |
45.7 |
| Q3:25-26 |
29.7 |
66.1 |
4.2 |
25.5 |
56.6 |
41.8 |
1.6 |
54.9 |
| Q4:25-26 |
25.6 |
69.4 |
5.0 |
20.6 |
56.3 |
43.4 |
0.3 |
56.0 |
| Q1:26-27 |
23.1 |
66.9 |
10.0 |
13.1 |
50.6 |
49.0 |
0.4 |
50.2 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
56.0 |
42.9 |
1.0 |
55.0 |
| ‘Increase’ in Technical/Service Capacity is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S13: Assessment and Expectation for Physical Investment |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
20.8 |
75.8 |
3.4 |
17.5 |
58.0 |
41.6 |
0.4 |
57.6 |
| Q2:25-26 |
25.5 |
68.4 |
6.0 |
19.5 |
43.1 |
56.0 |
0.9 |
42.3 |
| Q3:25-26 |
27.4 |
68.1 |
4.5 |
22.9 |
57.3 |
41.2 |
1.5 |
55.9 |
| Q4:25-26 |
20.3 |
75.0 |
4.7 |
15.6 |
54.9 |
44.6 |
0.5 |
54.4 |
| Q1:26-27 |
22.3 |
67.4 |
10.4 |
11.9 |
47.9 |
52.1 |
0.0 |
47.9 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
55.0 |
43.8 |
1.2 |
53.8 |
| ‘Increase’ in Physical Investment is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table S1 are applicable here. |
| Table S14: Estimated Spare Capacity for the Services Sector |
| Survey conducted during |
Reference quarter |
Response rate for the question on Spare Capacity (per cent) |
Spare Capacity (per cent) |
| Q3:2023-24 |
Q2:2023-24 |
74.0 |
11.8 |
| Q4:2023-24 |
Q3:2023-24 |
74.8 |
11.7 |
| Q1:2024-25 |
Q4:2023-24 |
78.8 |
11.3 |
| Q2:2024-25 |
Q1:2024-25 |
71.5 |
11.2 |
| Q3:2024-25 |
Q2:2024-25 |
79.9 |
10.6 |
| Q4:2024-25 |
Q3:2024-25 |
83.7 |
10.9 |
| Q1:2025-26 |
Q4:2024-25 |
65.7 |
11.2 |
| Q2:2025-26 |
Q1:2025-26 |
80.0 |
10.7 |
| Q3:2025-26 |
Q2:2025-26 |
77.4 |
10.1 |
| Q4:2025-26 |
Q3:2025-26 |
79.6 |
9.0 |
| Q1:2026-27 |
Q4:2025-26 |
78.2 |
8.8 |
Infrastructure Sector
| Table I1: Assessment and Expectation for Overall Business Situation |
| (Percentage responses)@ |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Better |
No Change |
Worse |
Net response# |
Better |
No Change |
Worse |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
41.3 |
49.6 |
9.1 |
32.2 |
72.2 |
24.5 |
3.3 |
68.9 |
| Q2:25-26 |
44.0 |
47.3 |
8.8 |
35.2 |
69.2 |
28.2 |
2.6 |
66.7 |
| Q3:25-26 |
41.3 |
44.7 |
14.0 |
27.3 |
71.1 |
25.6 |
3.3 |
67.8 |
| Q4:25-26 |
39.3 |
50.8 |
9.8 |
29.5 |
70.5 |
28.9 |
0.7 |
69.8 |
| Q1:26-27 |
34.3 |
47.1 |
18.6 |
15.7 |
74.4 |
23.1 |
2.5 |
71.9 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
59.6 |
35.4 |
5.1 |
54.5 |
‘Increase’ in Overall business situation is optimistic. @: Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100. #: Net Response (NR) is the difference of percentage of the respondents reporting optimism and that reporting pessimism. The range is -100 to 100. Any value greater than zero indicates expansion/ optimism and any value less than zero indicates contraction/ pessimism. |
| Table I2: Assessment and Expectation for Turnover |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
46.2 |
42.0 |
11.8 |
34.5 |
75.2 |
20.9 |
3.9 |
71.2 |
| Q2:25-26 |
46.7 |
41.3 |
12.0 |
34.8 |
69.2 |
26.5 |
4.3 |
65.0 |
| Q3:25-26 |
43.0 |
42.4 |
14.6 |
28.5 |
75.6 |
18.9 |
5.6 |
70.0 |
| Q4:25-26 |
39.8 |
49.6 |
10.6 |
29.3 |
72.0 |
26.0 |
2.0 |
70.0 |
| Q1:26-27 |
35.9 |
46.6 |
17.5 |
18.4 |
73.8 |
21.3 |
4.9 |
68.9 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
61.6 |
34.3 |
4.0 |
57.6 |
| ‘Increase’ in Turnover is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I3: Assessment and Expectation for Full-time Employees |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
22.7 |
70.6 |
6.7 |
16.0 |
61.2 |
37.5 |
1.3 |
59.9 |
| Q2:25-26 |
28.4 |
61.4 |
10.2 |
18.2 |
56.5 |
41.7 |
1.7 |
54.8 |
| Q3:25-26 |
33.3 |
57.3 |
9.3 |
24.0 |
49.4 |
46.0 |
4.6 |
44.8 |
| Q4:25-26 |
28.7 |
60.7 |
10.7 |
18.0 |
59.1 |
40.9 |
0.0 |
59.1 |
| Q1:26-27 |
26.2 |
62.1 |
11.7 |
14.6 |
58.7 |
39.7 |
1.7 |
57.0 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
51.0 |
44.9 |
4.1 |
46.9 |
| ‘Increase’ in Full-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I4: Assessment and Expectation for Part-time Employees |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
19.1 |
75.5 |
5.3 |
13.8 |
62.8 |
34.1 |
3.1 |
59.7 |
| Q2:25-26 |
23.7 |
69.7 |
6.6 |
17.1 |
66.3 |
31.5 |
2.2 |
64.1 |
| Q3:25-26 |
27.5 |
63.4 |
9.2 |
18.3 |
50.7 |
44.0 |
5.3 |
45.3 |
| Q4:25-26 |
27.1 |
62.6 |
10.3 |
16.8 |
63.5 |
34.9 |
1.6 |
61.9 |
| Q1:26-27 |
21.8 |
71.3 |
6.9 |
14.9 |
60.4 |
38.7 |
0.9 |
59.4 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
50.6 |
48.2 |
1.2 |
49.4 |
| ‘Increase’ in Part-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I5: Assessment and Expectation for Availability of Finance |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Improve |
No Change |
Worsen |
Net response |
Improve |
No Change |
Worsen |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
22.7 |
68.1 |
9.2 |
13.4 |
71.8 |
26.2 |
2.0 |
69.8 |
| Q2:25-26 |
41.3 |
51.1 |
7.6 |
33.7 |
63.5 |
34.8 |
1.7 |
61.7 |
| Q3:25-26 |
36.7 |
52.0 |
11.3 |
25.3 |
65.9 |
30.8 |
3.3 |
62.6 |
| Q4:25-26 |
27.9 |
64.8 |
7.4 |
20.5 |
62.4 |
36.9 |
0.7 |
61.7 |
| Q1:26-27 |
30.7 |
62.4 |
6.9 |
23.8 |
61.2 |
37.2 |
1.7 |
59.5 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
51.5 |
46.5 |
2.0 |
49.5 |
| ‘Improve’ in Availability of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I6: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Finance |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
25.0 |
65.8 |
9.2 |
-15.8 |
68.2 |
26.4 |
5.4 |
-62.8 |
| Q2:25-26 |
33.8 |
57.5 |
8.8 |
-25.0 |
60.5 |
35.1 |
4.4 |
-56.1 |
| Q3:25-26 |
39.4 |
49.3 |
11.3 |
-28.2 |
57.7 |
32.1 |
10.3 |
-47.4 |
| Q4:25-26 |
26.3 |
61.0 |
12.7 |
-13.6 |
60.3 |
34.8 |
5.0 |
-55.3 |
| Q1:26-27 |
29.5 |
62.1 |
8.4 |
-21.1 |
56.8 |
35.6 |
7.6 |
-49.2 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
43.6 |
51.1 |
5.3 |
-38.3 |
| ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I7: Assessment and Expectation for Salary/Wages |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
30.0 |
65.0 |
5.0 |
-25.0 |
66.7 |
32.7 |
0.7 |
-66.0 |
| Q2:25-26 |
28.3 |
69.6 |
2.2 |
-26.1 |
63.5 |
34.8 |
1.7 |
-61.7 |
| Q3:25-26 |
32.0 |
63.3 |
4.7 |
-27.3 |
48.4 |
49.5 |
2.2 |
-46.2 |
| Q4:25-26 |
27.9 |
65.6 |
6.6 |
-21.3 |
58.4 |
41.6 |
0.0 |
-58.4 |
| Q1:26-27 |
42.9 |
51.0 |
6.1 |
-36.7 |
64.5 |
35.5 |
0.0 |
-64.5 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
61.5 |
36.5 |
2.1 |
-59.4 |
| ‘Decrease’ in Salary/Wages is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I8: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Inputs |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
39.8 |
53.1 |
7.1 |
-32.7 |
74.3 |
22.4 |
3.3 |
-71.1 |
| Q2:25-26 |
52.7 |
42.9 |
4.4 |
-48.4 |
74.3 |
22.9 |
2.8 |
-71.6 |
| Q3:25-26 |
55.6 |
38.2 |
6.3 |
-49.3 |
60.0 |
37.8 |
2.2 |
-57.8 |
| Q4:25-26 |
45.4 |
47.1 |
7.6 |
-37.8 |
70.9 |
27.0 |
2.1 |
-68.8 |
| Q1:26-27 |
56.4 |
38.6 |
5.0 |
-51.5 |
72.9 |
24.6 |
2.5 |
-70.3 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
71.1 |
26.8 |
2.1 |
-69.1 |
| ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Inputs is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I9: Assessment and Expectation for Selling Price |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
22.9 |
67.6 |
9.5 |
13.3 |
62.9 |
36.4 |
0.8 |
62.1 |
| Q2:25-26 |
30.0 |
65.0 |
5.0 |
25.0 |
63.4 |
33.7 |
3.0 |
60.4 |
| Q3:25-26 |
31.7 |
58.7 |
9.5 |
22.2 |
50.0 |
43.6 |
6.4 |
43.6 |
| Q4:25-26 |
25.5 |
65.5 |
9.1 |
16.4 |
63.2 |
34.4 |
2.4 |
60.8 |
| Q1:26-27 |
35.6 |
57.8 |
6.7 |
28.9 |
59.6 |
38.5 |
1.8 |
57.8 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
55.8 |
41.9 |
2.3 |
53.5 |
| ‘Increase’ in Selling Price is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I10: Assessment and Expectation for Profit Margin |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
23.3 |
60.3 |
16.4 |
6.9 |
61.8 |
34.2 |
3.9 |
57.9 |
| Q2:25-26 |
35.6 |
52.2 |
12.2 |
23.3 |
55.7 |
40.0 |
4.3 |
51.3 |
| Q3:25-26 |
30.9 |
51.7 |
17.4 |
13.4 |
53.9 |
39.3 |
6.7 |
47.2 |
| Q4:25-26 |
23.3 |
59.2 |
17.5 |
5.8 |
67.8 |
27.5 |
4.7 |
63.1 |
| Q1:26-27 |
30.9 |
49.5 |
19.6 |
11.3 |
57.5 |
35.8 |
6.7 |
50.8 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
57.3 |
36.5 |
6.3 |
51.0 |
| ‘Increase’ in Profit Margin is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I11: Assessment and Expectation for Inventories |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
24.8 |
67.3 |
8.0 |
16.8 |
74.1 |
22.4 |
3.5 |
70.6 |
| Q2:25-26 |
39.7 |
51.3 |
9.0 |
30.8 |
62.7 |
32.7 |
4.5 |
58.2 |
| Q3:25-26 |
33.1 |
55.4 |
11.5 |
21.6 |
59.7 |
35.1 |
5.2 |
54.5 |
| Q4:25-26 |
26.3 |
58.5 |
15.3 |
11.0 |
66.9 |
29.4 |
3.7 |
63.2 |
| Q1:26-27 |
28.4 |
60.0 |
11.6 |
16.8 |
61.9 |
33.9 |
4.2 |
57.6 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
47.3 |
47.3 |
5.4 |
41.9 |
| ‘Increase’ in Inventories is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I12: Assessment and Expectation for Technical/Service Capacity |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
20.7 |
73.2 |
6.1 |
14.6 |
72.6 |
27.4 |
0.0 |
72.6 |
| Q2:25-26 |
29.4 |
66.2 |
4.4 |
25.0 |
72.2 |
26.6 |
1.3 |
70.9 |
| Q3:25-26 |
29.6 |
62.6 |
7.8 |
21.7 |
59.1 |
39.4 |
1.5 |
57.6 |
| Q4:25-26 |
25.0 |
68.0 |
7.0 |
18.0 |
70.3 |
28.8 |
0.9 |
69.4 |
| Q1:26-27 |
31.1 |
63.5 |
5.4 |
25.7 |
62.2 |
37.8 |
0.0 |
62.2 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
64.3 |
35.7 |
0.0 |
64.3 |
| ‘Increase’ in Technical/Service Capacity is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
| Table I13: Assessment and Expectation for Physical Investment |
| (Percentage responses) |
| Quarter |
Assessment |
Expectation |
| Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
Increase |
No Change |
Decrease |
Net response |
| Q1:25-26 |
25.0 |
70.2 |
4.8 |
20.2 |
73.8 |
26.2 |
0.0 |
73.8 |
| Q2:25-26 |
33.8 |
63.2 |
2.9 |
30.9 |
77.8 |
22.2 |
0.0 |
77.8 |
| Q3:25-26 |
32.2 |
60.9 |
7.0 |
25.2 |
68.2 |
30.3 |
1.5 |
66.7 |
| Q4:25-26 |
33.7 |
59.4 |
6.9 |
26.7 |
72.6 |
27.4 |
0.0 |
72.6 |
| Q1:26-27 |
30.7 |
64.0 |
5.3 |
25.3 |
71.7 |
28.3 |
0.0 |
71.7 |
| Q2:26-27 |
|
|
|
|
67.6 |
32.4 |
0.0 |
67.6 |
| ‘Increase’ in Physical Investment is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table I1 are applicable here. |
|